/[clonezilla-sysresccd]/trunk/www/2doc/doc/partitions.html

Diff of /trunk/www/2doc/doc/partitions.html

Parent Directory | Revision Log | View Patch Patch

-revision 179 by sng,
Sat Dec 11 09:41:39 2010 UTC
+revision 180 by sng,
Mon Jun  6 18:57:10 2011 UTC
 Line 91 
 To access our current stable version, pl
  <H2>Clonezilla-SysRescCD</H2>
  <H3>Offline Documentation: Managing partitions</H3>
    <div style="margin:0; padding: 3px; width: 980; position relative;">
-     <div style="position: absolute; left: 0px;"><H4>30/09/2010 - v 3.2.0</H4></div>
+     <div style="position: absolute; left: 0px;"><H4>30/06/2011 - v 3.2.0</H4></div>
-     <div style="position: absolute; right: 0px;"><H4>Last update: 08/10/2010</H4></div>
+     <div style="position: absolute; right: 0px;"><H4>Last update: 06/06/2011</H4></div>
    </div>
  </div>
  <div id="linkline">
 Line 127 
 This page contains some theory about par
  While partitioning, an user error or a bug can damage your partitions.<br><br>Creating a disk image of the disk to be<br>partitioned beforehand is highly recommended.
  </td></tr></table></div>
  <div align="center"><table class="note" border="0" cellpadding="20"><tr><td valign="top"><img src="images/info.png"></td><td>
- The following pressentation has been made using<br><b>SystemRescueCD v 1.5.8</b>
+ The following pressentation has been made using<br><b>SystemRescueCD v 2.1.1</b>
  </td></tr></table></div>
  <H2><a name="theory"></a>Some theory <span class="hideprint">[<a href="#partitions-top" title="go to top of the page">^</a>]</span></H2>
 Line 144 
 The following pressentation has been mad
  <H3><a name="partitions-extended"></a>What is the difference between primary, extended and logical partitions? <span class="hideprint">[<a href="#partitions-top" title="go to top of the page">^</a>]</span></H3>
- <p>Information about partitions is saved in so-called partition table in Master Boot Record. MBR itself is only 512 bytes in size, and only 64 bytes are reserved for partition table. That's not enough, and there are many workarounds to bypass limitations caused by the size, for example <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_block_addressing#LBA.2C_ATA_devices_and_Enhanced_BIOS" target="_blank">logical block addressing</a>. Extended partitions are another workaround.</p>
+ <p>Information about partitions is saved in so-called partition table in Master Boot Record. MBR itself is only 512 bytes in size, and only 64 bytes are reserved for partition table. That's not enough, and there are many workarounds to bypass limitations caused by the size, for example <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_block_addressing#Enhanced_BIOS" target="_blank">logical block addressing</a>. Extended partitions are another workaround.</p>
  <p>Partition table can only store information about four partitions. If one has, for example, two GNU/Linux distributions on the same disk, both of them having separate root partitions, shared /home and shared swap, the partition number limit has been hit already.</p>
 Line 248 
 The following pressentation has been mad
    </tr>
      <tr>
      <th>ext4</th>
-     <td style="background-color: rgb(255,0,0)">No***</td>
+     <td style="background-color: rgb(255,127,0)">3rd party driver</td>
          <td style="background-color: rgb(0,255,0)">Native</td>
          <td style="background-color: rgb(255,127,0)">16 GB-16 TB*</td>
          <td style="background-color: rgb(0,255,0)">Yes</td>
 Line 268 
 The following pressentation has been mad
  <p>* Depends on cluster size<br>
- ** <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/955704" target="_blank">This update</a> adds exFAT support to Windows XP<br>
+ ** <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/955704" target="_blank">This update</a> adds exFAT support to Windows XP</p>
- *** <a href="http://ext2read.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Ext2read</a> makes accessing ext4 partitions possible, but it's not a driver and the access is read-only</p>
  <p>Operating system support:</p>
-Line 277 
 The following pressentation has been mad
+Line 276 
 The following pressentation has been mad
  <li>"Native" means that the kernel supports the filesystem and the OS can boot from a partition using that FS.</li>
  <li>"Built-in" means that the kernel supports the filesystem, but booting from a partition containing such FS is very difficult.</li>
  <li>"Driver included" means that ntfs-3g (the driver that adds NTFS support to Linux) comes with most GNU/Linux distributions.</li>
- <li>"3rd party driver" means that drivers to add filesystem support are available, but must be downloaded and installed separately. The ext2/3 drivers are <a href="http://www.fs-driver.org" target="_blank">Ext2 IFS</a> and <a href="http://www.ext2fsd.com" target="_blank">Ext2fsd</a> and the exFAT driver is <a href="http://code.google.com/p/exfat/" target="_blank">exfat</a>.</li>
+ <li>"3rd party driver" means that a driver to add filesystem support is available, but must be downloaded and installed separately. The ext2/3/4 driver is <a href="http://www.ext2fsd.com" target="_blank">Ext2fsd</a> and the exFAT driver is <a href="http://code.google.com/p/exfat/" target="_blank">exfat</a>.</li>
- <li>"No" means that there is no way to get read-write filesystem support.</li>
  </ul>
  <H2><a name="filesystems"></a>Filesystems <span class="hideprint">[<a href="#partitions-top" title="go to top of the page">^</a>]</span></H2>
-Line 293 
 The following pressentation has been mad
+Line 291 
 The following pressentation has been mad
  <p>FAT32 was first introduced with Windows 95 OSR2. Windows 98, Windows Me, Windows 2000 and newer support FAT32 too. Linux kernel has supported FAT32 almost as long as Windows, but booting GNU/Linux from FAT32 partition is difficult and actually requires DOS to be installed in the partition as well. (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FAT_filesystem_and_Linux#Installing_Linux_on_and_booting_it_from_FAT_volumes_using_umsdos" target="_blank">more information</a>)</p>
- <p>FAT32 partition can be up to two terabytes in size. As of now (July 2010), there are hard drives that hit the limit, but don't exceed it. A single file within FAT32 partition can be up to four gigabytes in size.</p>
+ <p>FAT32 partition can be up to two terabytes in size. There are already hard drives that exceed the limit. A single file within FAT32 partition can be up to four gigabytes in size.</p>
  <p>Because FAT32 is, in the end, based on FAT12, it has very few features. It doesn't support file permissions, hard/symbolic links, encryption, compression, alternative data streams, journaling... It lacks support for nearly anything that defines a modern filesystem. However, due to very few features, FAT32 is very fast filesystem if it's not fragmented or on a Flash-based drive. Mind you, FAT32 fragments very fast.</p>
-Line 305 
 The following pressentation has been mad
+Line 303 
 The following pressentation has been mad
  <p>Ext2 was developed in January 1993, earlier than any other filesystem mentioned in this page.</p>
- <p>Because ext2 is designed for GNU/Linux, support in Linux kernel was implemented immediately. The first Windows driver supporting ext2, <a href="http://www.ext2fsd.com" target="_blank">Ext2fsd</a> 0.01, was released on 25 January 2002. Both Windows drivers for ext2 work only on Windows NT operating systems (NT 4.0 up to Vista, 7 isn't supported yet).</p>
+ <p>Because ext2 is designed for GNU/Linux, support in Linux kernel was implemented immediately. The first Windows driver supporting ext2, <a href="http://www.ext2fsd.com" target="_blank">Ext2fsd</a> 0.01, was released on 25 January 2002. Ext2fsd works only on Windows NT operating systems starting from Windows 2000.</p>
  <p>The best property of ext2 is extensibility. The superblock contains information about which version the filesystem is (ext2, ext3 or ext4) and which extensions and features are in use. By using these pieces of information, the operating system or driver can decide whether or not mounting the partition is safe. That's the most important reason why most GNU/Linux distributions still use successors of ext2 as default filesystems.</p>
-Line 313 
 The following pressentation has been mad
+Line 311 
 The following pressentation has been mad
  <p>Ext2 supports file permissions, both hard and symbolic links and extended file attributes. Encryption, compression and journaling are unsupported.</p>
- <p>Due to lack of journaling support and existence of Windows drivers, I recommend using ext2 if you're going to install GNU/Linux on a SSD drive and want to be able to access files within Windows too.</p>
+ <p>Lack of journaling support is the worst limitation of ext2. What was done in order to get rid of the limitation?</p>
- <p>However, lack of journaling support is the worst limitation of ext2. And what was done in order to get rid of the limitation?</p>
  <H3><a name="partitions-ext3"></a>ext3 <span class="hideprint">[<a href="#partitions-top" title="go to top of the page">^</a>]</span></H3>
  <p>Ext3, the successor of ext2, was introduced in Linux kernel on November 2001. It supports journaling, can be grown online and optionally indexes large directories.</p>
- <p>Ext2 IFS and Ext2fsd can mount ext3 partition as ext2 if the journal is empty. (If it's not, something is wrong - journal is always emptied when the partition is unmounted or the computer is shut down.) Thus, ext3 support under Windows is just as good/bad as ext2 support.</p>
+ <p>Ext2fsd can mount ext3 partition as ext2. Thus, ext3 support under Windows is just as good/bad as ext2 support.</p>
  <p>Partition and file size limits are the same as in ext2: partition size limit is 2-32 TB and file size limit 16 GB-2 TB, depending on cluster size.</p>
- <p>Due to journaling support and existence of Windows drivers, ext3 is a good choice if you're going to install GNU/Linux on a mechanical hard drive and want to be able to access files within Windows.</p>
+ <p>Ext3 is becoming obsolete because there is...</p>
  <H3><a name="partitions-ext4"></a>ext4 <span class="hideprint">[<a href="#partitions-top" title="go to top of the page">^</a>]</span></H3>
-Line 335 
 The following pressentation has been mad
+Line 331 
 The following pressentation has been mad
  <p>Another important improvement is larger partition size limit: an ext4 partition can be even one exabyte in size. (An exabyte is a million terabytes.) In addition, a directory within an ext4 partition can contain up to 64 000 subdirectories (instead of 32 000, as in ext2/3) and timestamps are much more accurate. The file size limit is 16 GB-16 TB, depending on cluster size.</p>
- <p>Unfortunately, Ext2 IFS and Ext2Fsd don't support ext4 and are unable to mount ext4 partition if extents are enabled. They can be disabled, but other improvements of ext4 aren't that important for most people - using ext2 or ext3 is just easier. It is also possible to keep extents enabled and browse the partition using <a href="http://ext2read.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Ext2read</a>, but Ext2read doesn't allow the user to write to the partition.</p>
+ <p>Ext2fsd 0.50, released on 5 February 2011, supports ext4 and is able to mount ext4 partition even if extents are enabled. Thus, ext4 support under Windows is just as good/bad as ext2 support.</p>
- <p>Due to its features, ext4 is a good filesystem on computers that only have GNU/Linux installed. Because journaling can be disabled, it is suitable for Solid State Drives and thumb drives too.</p>
+ <p>Due to availability of Ext2fsd 0.50 and additional features, ext4 has become the de-facto GNU/Linux filesystem. Because journaling can be disabled, it is suitable for Solid State Drives and thumb drives too.</p>
  <H3><a name="partitions-ntfs"></a>NTFS <span class="hideprint">[<a href="#partitions-top" title="go to top of the page">^</a>]</span></H3>
-Line 457 
 Linux partitions, such as <b>ext2</b>, <
+Line 453 
 Linux partitions, such as <b>ext2</b>, <
  <p>This section contains a partitioning example. I simulate the following situation in a virtual machine:</p>
- <p>I have two partitions in my disk: <b>/dev/sda1</b> that contains a GNU/Linux distribution, and <b>/dev/sda2</b> that is a swap partition. Here we can see the output of <b>fdisk</b>:</p>
+ <p>I have two partitions in my disk: <b>/dev/sda1</b> that contains a GNU/Linux distribution, and <b>/dev/sda2</b> that is a swap partition. Here we can see the output of <b>parted</b>:</p>
- <p class="newcode">root@sysresccd /root % fdisk -l<br>
+ <p class="newcode">root@sysresccd /root % parted -l<br>
+ Model: ATA VBOX HARDDISK (scsi)<br>
+ Disk /dev/sda: 2097MB<br>
+ Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B<br>
+ Partition Table: msdos<br>
+ <br>
+ Number&nbsp;&nbsp;Start&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;End&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Size&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Type&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;File&nbsp;system&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Flags<br>
+ &nbsp;1&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;32.3kB&nbsp;&nbsp;1679MB&nbsp;&nbsp;1679MB&nbsp;&nbsp;primary&nbsp;&nbsp;ext4&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;boot<br>
+ &nbsp;2&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;1679MB&nbsp;&nbsp;2097MB&nbsp;&nbsp;418MB&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;primary&nbsp;&nbsp;linux-swap(v1)<br>
+ <br>
  <br>
- Disk /dev/sda: 2097 MB, 2097152000 bytes<br>
+ Warning: Unable to open /dev/sr0 read-write (Read-only file system).&nbsp;&nbsp;/dev/sr0 has been opened read-only.<br>
-heads, 63 sectors/track, 1015 cylinders<br>
+ Error: /dev/sr0: unrecognised disk label<br>
- Units = cylinders of 4032 * 512 = 2064384 bytes<br>
- Disk identifier: 0x00058a4a<br>
  <br>
- &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Device&nbsp;Boot&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Start&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;End&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Blocks&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Id&nbsp;&nbsp;System<br>
+ Error: /dev/fd0: unrecognised disk label</p>
- /dev/sda1&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;*&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;1&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;812&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;1636960+&nbsp;&nbsp;83&nbsp;&nbsp;Linux<br>
- /dev/sda2&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;813&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;1015&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;409248&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;82&nbsp;&nbsp;Linux swap / Solaris</p>
  <p>Now I'm going to install another distribution on the same disk. First of all, I need one more partition, because only one distro can be installed on one partition. In addition, I want to separate /home to its own partition in order to be able to share it between distributions.</p>
-Line 491 
 Disk identifier: 0x00058a4a<br>
+Line 492 
 Disk identifier: 0x00058a4a<br>
  <p>I right-click now <b>/dev/sda2</b> and select <b>Resize/Move</b>.</p>
  <img src="images/gparted-03.png">
  <p>I enter 0 MB as preceding free space and 200 MB as partition size, click the <b>Free Space Following (MiB)</b> combo box and press <b>Resize/Move</b>.</p>
+ <img src="images/gparted-03a.png">
+ <p>I read the warning. As the swap partition doesn't contain /boot (or any files, for that matter), I just click <b>OK</b>.</p>
  <img src="images/gparted-04.png">
  <p>I right-click the unallocated area and select <b>New</b>.</p>
  <img src="images/gparted-05.png">
-Line 502 
 Disk identifier: 0x00058a4a<br>
+Line 505 
 Disk identifier: 0x00058a4a<br>
  <img src="images/gparted-08.png">
  <p>I right-click the remaining unallocated space and select <b>New</b> one more time.</p>
  <img src="images/gparted-09.png">
- <p>I choose the ext4 filesystem again. The partition size setting was already 200 megabytes (the whole available space), so I just press <b>Add</b>.</p>
+ <p>I choose the ext4 filesystem again. The partition size setting was already 199 megabytes (the whole available space), so I just press <b>Add</b>.</p>
  <img src="images/gparted-10.png">
  <div align="center"><table class="note" border="0" cellpadding="20"><tr><td valign="top"><img src="images/important.png"></td><td>
  The next step is to commit the changes.<br><br>After that some operations, for example<br>partition deletion, can no longer be undone.
-Line 567 
 mkdir home</p>
+Line 570 
 mkdir home</p>
    <div id="footer">
  <div id="docline-bottom">  <a href="sysresccd.html">&lt; PREV</a>  <a href="../README.html">UP</a>  <a href="recover.html">NEXT &gt;</a>  </div>
-   <p>Copyright: &#169; <a href="mailto:&#115;&#110;&#103;&#064;&#104;&#101;&#108;&#108;&#117;&#103;&#046;&#103;&#114;?subject=About Clonezilla-SysRescCD v 3.2.0">Spiros Georgaras</a>, 2007-2010<br /><br/>
+   <p>Copyright: &#169; <a href="mailto:&#115;&#110;&#103;&#064;&#104;&#101;&#108;&#108;&#117;&#103;&#046;&#103;&#114;?subject=About Clonezilla-SysRescCD v 3.2.0" title="About Clonezilla-SysRescCD">Spiros Georgaras</a>, 2007-2011 &amp; <a href="mailto:&#115;&#097;&#110;&#100;&#103;&#116;&#120;&#064;&#103;&#109;&#097;&#105;&#108;&#046;&#099;&#111;&#109;?subject=About Clonezilla-SysRescCD v 3.2.0 documentation" title="About Clonezilla-SysRescCD Documentation">Jyrki Vesterinen</a>, 2010-2011<br /><br/>
    Hosted by <a href="http://hellug.gr/index.php/OSullogos/Tautothta?from=Main.HELLUG" target="_blank" title="Hellenic Linux User Group">HEL.L.U.G.</a></p>
    </div>
  </div>

 Legend:



Removed from v.179
 


changed lines


 
Added in v.180
 Legend:



Removed from v.179
 


changed lines


 
Added in v.180
-Removed from v.179
+Added in v.180

webmaster@linux.gr	ViewVC Help
Powered by ViewVC 1.1.26